TAX LEGISLATION
Home Back Services Contact  

 

 TAX LEGISLATION  

 Social Security Changes

 The Social Security wage base for 2011 is $106,800

 Phased-in Individual Income Tax Rate Cuts

Marginal Tax Rate
                 
 
Tax Years
             
 
2001
Refund
15%
27.5%*
30.5%*
35.5%*
39.1%*
 
 
2002 - 2003
10%
15%
27%
30%
35%
38.6%
 
 
2004 - 2005
10%
15%
26%
29%
34%
37.6%
 
 
2006 - 2010
10%
15%
25%
28%
33%
35%
 
 
2011
10%
15%
25%
28%
33%
35%
 
                 
  *Effective Rate, 2001          
                 

IRS Issues Home Sale Exclusion Rules

 

IR-2002-142, Dec. 23, 2002

WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Service today issued guidance in the form of both final and temporary regulations related to excluding gain on the sale of a principal residence. A 1997 law substituted an exclusion of up to $250,000 ($500,000 for a married couple filing jointly) for the old “replacement residence” rules. Unlike a previous once-in-a-lifetime exclusion for senior citizens, the new exclusion may be claimed repeatedly, but usually only once every two years.

The final regulations cover such topics as:

how to determine if a home is a principal residence;
when gain from the sale of vacant land that was used as part of the residence may be excluded;
when and how to allocate the gain between residential and business use of the property;
how the exclusion applies to joint owners who are not married; and
how to fulfill the requirement that the taxpayer own and use the home as a principal residence for two of the five years before the sale.

For taxpayers with multiple homes, the regulations list several factors relevant to determining which home is the principal residence. Among these are amount of time used; place of employment; where other family members live; the address used for tax returns, driver’s license, car and voter registration, bills and correspondence; and the location of the taxpayer’s banks, religious organizations or recreational clubs.

The home sale exclusion may include gain from the sale of vacant land that has been used as part of the residence, if the land sale occurs within two years before or after the sale of the residence.

Taxpayers need not allocate gain between business and residential use if the business use occurred within the same dwelling unit as the residential use. They must pay tax on the gain equal to the total depreciation they took after May 6, 1997, but may exclude any additional gain on the residence, up to the maximum amount.  If the business use property was separate from the dwelling unit, they would allocate the gain and be able to exclude only the gain on the residential unit.

For joint owners who are not married, up to $250,000 of gain is tax-free for each qualifying owner.

To exclude gain, a taxpayer must both own and use the home as a principal residence for two of the five years before the sale. The ownership and use periods need not be concurrent. The two years may consist of 24 full months or 730 days. Short absences, such as for a summer vacation, count as periods of use, but longer breaks, such as a one-year sabbatical, do not. The taxpayer also must not have excluded gain on another home sold during the two years before the current sale.

The IRS made these final regulations available for public comment in October 2000.  Several changes resulted from the comments received, including the treatment of gain on property used for both business and residential purposes.

Today, the IRS invited comments on new temporary regulations on the subject of excluding gain, but with a reduced maximum amount, when the seller does not satisfy one of the time rules. The tax law provides an exception to the two-year rules for use, ownership and claimed exclusion when the primary reason for the sale is health, change in place of employment, or, to the extent provided in IRS regulations, “unforeseen circumstances.”

Taxpayers may establish by the facts and circumstances of their situations that their home sales were for one of these reasons. To make things easier, the IRS has identified various “safe harbors” that will automatically establish that the sale is for one of these reasons.

The temporary regulations provide that a home sale will be considered related to a change in employment if a qualified person’s new place of work is at least 50 miles farther from the old home than the old workplace was from that home. This is the same distance rule that applies for the moving expense deduction. The employment change must occur during the taxpayer’s ownership and use of the home as a residence. A qualified person is the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse, a co-owner of the home, or a member of the taxpayer’s household.

A sale will be considered because of health if the primary reason is related to a disease, illness, or injury of a qualified person. If a physician recommends a change in residence for health reasons, that will suffice. In addition to the persons listed above, a qualified person for health reasons includes certain close relatives, so that sales related to caring for sick family members will qualify.

A sale will be considered as occurring primarily because of “unforeseen circumstances” if any of these events occur during the taxpayer’s period of use and ownership of the residence:

death,
divorce or legal separation,
becoming eligible for unemployment compensation,
a change in employment that leaves the taxpayer unable to pay the mortgage or reasonable basic living expenses,
multiple births resulting from the same pregnancy,
damage to the residence resulting from a natural or man-made disaster, or an act of war or terrorism, and
condemnation, seizure or other involuntary conversion of the property.

Any of the first five situations listed must involve the taxpayer, spouse, co-owner, or a member of the taxpayer’s household to qualify. The regulations also give the IRS Commissioner the discretion to determine other circumstances as unforeseen. 

For qualifying sellers, the maximum exclusion amount of $250,000 ($500,000 for a married couple filing jointly) is limited to the percentage of the two years that the person fulfilled the requirements. Thus, a qualifying seller who owns and occupies a home for one year (half of two years) – and who has not excluded gain on another home in that time – may exclude half the regular maximum amount, or up to $125,000 of gain ($250,000 for most joint returns). The proportion may be figured in days or months.

A taxpayer who now qualifies for a reduced maximum exclusion and has already reported a gain from the sale of a residence on a prior year’s tax return may use Form 1040X to file an amended return claiming the exclusion. Taxpayers may generally amend returns until three years from the original due date. The law did not require taxpayers to meet one of the exceptions before using the reduced maximum exclusion for homes owned on August 5, 1997, and sold within two years after that date. Thus, nearly all taxpayers qualifying under these regulations should be able to use them by amending a recent year’s return.

 

IRS Again Updates Web Item Debunking Frivolous Tax Arguments

 

IR-2003-15, Feb. 12, 2003

WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Service has again updated its Web site document addressing false arguments about the legality of not paying taxes or filing returns. The revisions add citations from several cases decided by the courts during 2002 and respond to one additional argument, making a total of 21 frivolous contentions that are addressed.

“During the filing season, taxpayers will sometimes hear absurd suggestions that they don’t have to pay taxes or file returns,” said IRS Acting Commissioner Bob Wenzel. “We want people to know the truth about these schemes – they don’t work.” 

This past year, the courts have not only rebuked such arguments dozens of times, but also imposed thousands of dollars in fines on taxpayers or their attorneys for pursuing frivolous cases.

IRS Chief Counsel B. John Williams said, "The courts have repeatedly and consistently rejected these arguments and are imposing substantial penalties on taxpayers and promoters for taking frivolous positions. These schemes carry a heavy price, for both the promoters and the participants."

The IRS Chief Counsel’s Office prepared The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments in 2001 and revised it last April. The document not only lays out the assertions, it also provides a summary of the law and relevant legal decisions involving these false claims. 

There are also links to the document from “The Newsroom” section’s “What’s Hot” page, the “Tax Pro News” and the “Topics for Individuals” pages of this site.

The IRS continues to investigate promoters of frivolous arguments and to refer cases to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. Taxpayers who file frivolous income tax returns face a $500 penalty, and may be subject to civil penalties of 20 or 75 percent of the underpaid tax. Those who pursue frivolous tax cases in the courts may face a penalty of up to $25,000, in addition to the taxes, interest and civil penalties that they may owe.

Tax Benefits Relating to Children

  The new law covers four broad areas relating to children. Here are the highlights.

 Child Tax Credit is $1,000 for 2011 per dependent child until age 17 at December 31.

 Adoption Expenses . The legislation permanently extends the adoption credit and increases the maximum amount to $13,360 applies against expenses incurred.

 Dependent Care Credit The maximum credit for many taxpayers is $3000 for one qualifying individual or $6,000 for two or more

 Education Provisions

  The law contains several education-related benefits.  Here's a brief summary:

 *       American Opportunity Tax Credit - $2,500 maximum per student

 *       Lifetime Learning Credit - $2,000 maximum per taxpayer

*        Coverdell Education Savings Accounts - up to $2,000 per year

 Student Loan Interest Deduction . Maximum amount $2,500

 *       Phase-out singles between $60,000 - $75,000, Marrieds between $120,000 - $150,000

Retirement Savings Provisions

Rollovers Get Easier

In an attempt to do away with barriers that complicate retirement savings, the new law will also make it possible to consolidate different types of retirement accounts into one.  Balances from IRAs, 401(k)s, 403(b)s and 457 plans can be rolled into one another, making it easier to manage retirement planning and income after retirement.  

Phase-in Retirement Savings Provisions

2011
Traditional IRA, Roth IRA, Spousal Guardian $  5,000
Traditional, Roth, Spousal IRA Catch-up Contribution $  1,000
Elective Deferrals 
(402g,401k SARSEP, 457 and 403b
$16,500
SIMPLE Plan Deferrals $11,500
SIMPLE IRA Catch-up Limit $  2,500
Defined Contribution 415 Limit
 (the lesser of 100% of comp or)
$49,000
Salary Deferral Catch-up Limit
(does not count against 415 Limits in a 401K plan)
$  5,500

     

   Death Tax Repeal

  • The repeal applies to the Federal estate and generation-skipping taxes. It does not repeal the Federal gift tax. Also, the legislation does not eliminate any State "death taxes";

  • Death tax repeal may eliminate the income tax savings achieved through a "step up" in the basis of property received from a decedent. As a result, families may not be able to take advantage of the potential benefits of death tax repeal without careful planning.
Year

Top Estate
Tax Rate

Exemption
Amount

2002
50%
$1 million
2003
49%
$1 million
2004
48%
$1.5 million
2005
47%
$1.5 million
2006
46%
$2 million
2007
45%
$2 million
2008
45%
$2 million
2009
45%
$3.5 million
2010
repealed
all*
2011
35%
$5 million
 
 

   

 
 
     
Click here for Background Checks, Public records
COPYRIGHT 2000 - 2011 John Van Vorst, CPA, P.A.
    Last modified: December 27, 2011